California has 40 percent of the nation’s ADA lawsuits but only 12 percent of the country’s disabled population. So over the last few years BOMA California members have worked closely with legislators and the Governor to move forward reforms that curb lawsuit abuse while promoting increased compliance with disable accessibility codes.
The effort is the culmination of a multi-year, bipartisan effort, that included leadership from state level elected officials and federal support coming from Senator Dianne Feinstein.
The first, in 2012, was SB 1186. The law:
- Reduced statutory damages and litigation protections for defendants who correct violations.
- New provisions to prevent stacking of multiple claims to increase statutory damages.
- Banned demands for money and created new rules for demand letters.
- New pleading with specificity requirement for demand letters and complaints.
- State Bar review of demand letters; violation of demand letter and demand for money provisions would begrounds for attorney discipline.
- Mandatory evaluation conference at option of either defendant of plaintiff.
- Mandatory notice to property tenant of CASp status of the property.
- California Commission on Disability Access (CCDA) to receive copies of complaints and demand lettersand tabulate data on top ten types of violations alleged.
- CCDA to promote and facilitate accessibility compliance.
- Required information regarding disability access compliance upon renewal of business license.
- New add-on fee of $1 to business license fee to strengthen CASp program and develop educational and training resources at state and local level to promote compliance.
The second, signed into law in 2016, was SB 269 (Roth) which:
- Establishes a presumption that certain technical violations are presumed to not be a cause for action.
- Applies to small businesses (25 or fewer employees).
- Business has 15 days to correct the violation.
- Technical violations include non-access issues such as wording and placement of signs, lack of signs, order of signs, color of signs and parking stripes, paint issues (faded, chipped, etc) on otherwise compliant parking spaces, certain warning surface issues.
- The law States that the above presumption affects the plaintiff’s burden of proof and is rebuttable by a preponderance of the evidence showing that the plaintiff did, in fact, experience difficulty, discomfort, or embarrassment on the particular occasion as a result of one or more of the technical violations.
- Protects certain businesses from liability for minimum statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim made during the 120 day period after the business obtains an inspection of its premises by a CASp, under specified conditions.